I want to meet the fools who design residential
toilets. I suspect they are all long dead though.
25 years after men walked on the moon
the USA still has toilets that must have been designed in the dark ages
before simple engineering principles were adopted.
Here is why I have come to this conclusion.
For some months we have been woken at night when a toilet cistern decided
it need to top up, so the filler mechanism open the water valve and for
about 3 seconds the night silence is punctured by the sound of water filling
the tank and then it slams shut again when the water level is high enough.
This symptom is a result of a slow trickle of water past the flapper into
the bowl. Eventually the water level in the cistern is low enough to trigger
the refilling. Apart from the wasted water, the noise during the night
is annoying. (Of course it also happens during the day but it goes unnoticed
because of other noises.)
I replaced the flapper. A couple of
times. Within a few weeks or months we were back to hearing night time
fill ups.
Let me explain a bit how it all works.
The cistern (or tank above the toilet) holds water ready for use. There
is a rubber or plastic flapper in the tank that covers large hole in the
bottom of the cistern. When you push the flush lever, it pulls a chain
which lifts the flapper and the water rushes out and into the bowl. Then
the flapper returns and the water is refilled by the filling mechanism
which is usually some sort of float connected to an inlet valve. When the
water rises to the desired level, the float pushes a lever which in turn
shuts off the valve.
Sounds simple enough, but there are
way too many moving parts and points of failure and the whole system essentially
cannot be properly maintained.
Instead of using the water pressure
of the water supply to hold the flapper valve closed, the design relies
on the weight of the flapper itself plus the pressure of the water above
it to make a seal against the hole in the bottom of the tank. Any wear
or deterioration of either side of the seal calls for replacing a part.
I expect rubber or plastic seals to need periodic replacement (say every
5 years). I furthermore expect that replacing such a part should be achieved
with a minimum of tools (if any) and the operation should be possible in
about 10 minutes. I also expect any adjustments to be able to be performed
in a positive way. By positive I mean that adjustments should be done by
means of a threaded (or equivalent) part that will not corrode in a wet
environment. It simply is not so, and it gets worse...
Since replacing the flapper did not
solve the problem, I decided that the part onto which the flapper has to
seal needed replacing.
In order to replace the lower part of
the flapper seat you have to remove the entire cistern from the toilet!
This is because the think is fastened on from below. In order to remove
the cistern it has to be unbolted from the toilet itself and guess what...
the bolts go through the bottom of the tank, below the water line.
This means that you have to disturb 2 or 3 water tight seals to remove
the cistern. not only that, after some years of being in place the bolts
corrode and get cemented together with lime deposits etc. The lower end
of the bolts are down behind the toilet where they sometimes cannot even
be seen, you have to feel about to find to the lower end.
In my case I could get one of the bolts
undone but the second one simply would not budge. I got vice grips onto
the wing-nut below and held the other end with a large screwdriver from
above. No amount of straining would turn the wing-nut. I was forced to
insert a hack saw blade between the tank and the toilet and cut through
the bolt that I was not even able to see.
In addition to these bolts, there is
also the issue of the water inlet. The water supply comes out of the wall
to a shut off valve and then up into the bottom of the tank. Yes, the underside,
below the water line! The underside of the tank has 4 or 5 holes that are
below the water line when at maximum, only one should be there. To remove
the tank, the water supply also has to be disconnected. The hose that goes
from the shut-off valve to the connection on the underside of the tank
was in my case also cemented up with lime so much that the top could not
be unscrewed from the fill mechanism that is inside the cistern. To disconnect
it I had to unthread the filler inside the tank while the hose connection
below remained stationery. This breaks the last of all the seals on the
underside of the tank.
After some back breaking hours I was
able to remove the cistern. Of course every seal on the underside now has
to be replaced because the old seals (rubber) are now hardened and will
never go back in exactly the same place and so will never make a water
tight seal again. In addition the connection line from the shut-off to
the tank inlet will also no longer make a good seal ever again so that
also has to be replaced. Another trip to the hardware store.
I had bough the Fluidmaster replacement
kit from Home Depot for the flush mechanism It consists of a new flapper,
flapper seat, new bolts and seals for the tank and also a large seal to
seal the underside of the tank to the toilet.
Since the filler mechanism was working
just fine, I had not bought a replacement for that, but now since I had
removed it from the tank (to undo the supply line) I needed a new seal
where the filler penetrates the bottom of the tank, and guess what, you
have to buy the whole filler mechanism to get the seal. So a third trip
to a hardware store was made to get a new filler kit.
So in order to replace a single part
that one expects needs periodic replacement, I had to remove the entire
tank and replace everything inside it plus the supply line. You
cannot find a better example of something that is not maintainable. It
seems that people no longer care about maintenance, everything simply gets
replaced if anything needs attention. How many thousands of plumbers do
this job every week? I suspect most customers never know what is going
on.
And for crying out loud, what are these
confounded things made out of china? China is fragile. It is nice and smooth
which aids cleaning but we have mastered numerous types of materials (plastic,
stainless steel, etc) that would be way better.
Have you noticed that nonresidential
toilets do not have these ridiculous mechanisms that are so prone to failure?
They have a decent water main that delivers water as needed. No tank, no
connections, no floats, no stupid flappers.
One may argue that residential homes
do not have a big enough water main supply, but all new buildings could
simply insist on having a 2" water main and thus be able to install
better toilets. For existing installations, much of this nonsense could
be solved by intelligent design of the system....
Tips for toilet designers
For one thing, make the tank and toilet
out of a single piece of material. This would remove the need to bolt one
part onto the other. It would also remove the need to create water tight
seals between the two parts. If people insist on having a separate tank,
then do one of two things: (1) attach the tank to the wall up high, where
they used to be - it provides a much better head of water (pressure) when
flushing, or (2) make the attachment system external to the tank, so that
the attachment system does not breach the tank. Bolting a water tank down
through the bottom is one of the most stupid designs I have seen in a long
time.
Next, bring the water into the tank
above the fill water line. This is so damn obvious. There is absolutely
no sane reason to bring this up through the tank below the water line.
Doing so simply creates another point of failure (leak). When we lived
in the third world (South Africa) the water supply came in from above.
It seems that while the USA was putting men on the moon, Africa was forging
way ahead on toilet design.
Use the water line pressure to hold
the flush valve closed instead of relying on a few inches of water pressure.
Finally ensure that all seals that are
non static can be replaced without replacing or removing anything significant.
Even better design a maintenance free system.
Dale Schultz August 20th, 2006 06:06:52 PM